International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature

Case 3673

Overview

Case 3673: Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 (Chilopoda): proposed conservation of the specific name

Status of Case:Resolved (Opinion Issued)
Date Published:03/2015
Authors: Bonato, L., Minelli, A.
Volume and Issue:72/1
Pagination:
Keywords: Nomenclature, taxonomy, Chilopoda, Geophilus, Geophilus alpinus, Geophilus impressus, Geophilus palustris, geophilomorph centipedes
Taxonomic Group(s): Chilopoda
Abstract:

The purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.3 of the Code, is to conserve the specific name Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 for a widespread European species of geophilomorph centipedes. This name, currently in use, is threatened by the subjective synonyms Geophilus impressus C.L. Koch, 1847 and Geophilus palustris C.L. Koch, 1863, which have been disregarded since 1874 and 1882 respectively.

Full Text:

https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v72i1.a10

External Links: Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

Opinions

Opinion 2450: Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 (Chilopoda): specific name not conserved
Status of Case:
Date Published:04/2020
Authors: ICZN
Volume and Issue:77/
Pagination:
Keywords: Nomenclature, taxonomy, Chilopoda, Geophilus, Geophilus alpinus, Geophilus impressus, Geophilus palustris, geophilomorph centipedes
Taxonomic Group(s):
Abstract:

The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has declined to use its plenary power to conserve the specific name of Geophilus alpinus Meinert, 1870 for a European species of geophilomorph centipede. As a result, the name impressus C.L. Koch, 1847 as published in the binomen Geophilus impressus has priority over the names palustris C.L. Koch, 1863, as published in the binomen Geophilus palustris and alpinus Meinert, 1870, as published in the binomen Geophilus alpinus whenever the former is considered synonymous with either of the latter.

Full Text:

https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v77.a016

External Links: Google Scholar BibTex XML RIS

For further information, please contact us.