@article {176,
	title = {Opinion 2434: Chionobas chryxus Doubleday, 1849 (currently Oeneis chryxus; Insecta, Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): conservation of usage by designation of a neotype not granted},
	journal = {Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature},
	volume = {76},
	year = {2019},
	month = {8},
	type = {Opinion},
	chapter = {141},
	abstract = {<p>The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has declined to use its plenary power to set aside the existing lectotype of <em>Chionobas chryxus</em> Doubleday, 1849 and to designate a neotype. However, the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has used its specific powers to confirm that the name-bearing type is the male specimen illustrated in Doubleday (1849).</p>},
	keywords = {Nomenclature, taxonomy, Insecta, Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Oeneis, Oeneis chryxus, Oeneis calais altacordillera, nymphalid butterfly, Rocky Mountains},
	author = {ICZN}
}
