<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="4.x">Silverstripe-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Santiago-Blay, Jorge A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ratcliffe, Brett C</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Krell, Frank-T</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anderson, Robert</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case 3459: Allotypes should be from the type series: a position paper for reinstating Recommendation 72A from the third edition of the Code that defines the term ‘allotype’.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature</style></secondary-title></titles><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Case</style></work-type></record></records></xml>