International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature
Siberian Tiger
     
 
 
ABOUT ICZN

-Mission and vision

-What we do

-Secretariat

-Commissioners

-History of ICZN

THE CODE

-The Code online

(Supported by the John Spedan Lewis Trust)

-Order a copy

-Declaration 44

-Formation of names

THE BULLETIN
(2001-)

-Cases

-Comments

-Opinions

-General Articles and Nomenclatural Notes

-Instructions for authors

-Guidelines for Case preparation

-Order the Bulletin

OFFICIAL LISTS and INDEXES

-Names in Zoology, up to 2007

-Names & Works in Zoology, 1915 - 1985 & 1986 - 2000

-Works in Zoology, 1986 to present

-Purchase Official Lists and Indexes

ABOUT ITZN

-The Trust

-Trustees

-Fundraising

-Managing ICZN's finances

Registration of Existing Names
Retrospective registration of all existing names is clearly a major attraction of ZooBank, and one for which the collaboration with Zoological Record will prove indispensable. Zoological Record staff, during routine scanning and databasing of published articles, will supply ZooBank with all the data needed for registration, enabling the ICZN Secretariat to alert authors that their data are being registered. Similarly, Zoological Record will be alerted to any overlooked animal names and taxonomic acts via ZooBank. Free access to Zoological Record's Index of Organism Names (ION) will enable ZooBank to eventually become a complete database of all animal species. Such a complete list will serve many valuable functions that contribute to increased stability of zoological nomenclature.

Mandatory Registration
In order for ZooBank to be a complete register of animal names and the nomenclatural acts that affect them, registration must be a mandatory requirement for availability according to the Code. A voluntary system, while potentially of some use, would negate the final aim of complete coverage. In the long term, mandatory registration should eventually apply to all zoological names and nomenclatural acts. A more practical approach for the short term, however, would be to require registration for all newly proposed names and nomenclatural acts, while accommodating voluntary registration of previously existing names and acts. Mandatory registration has the added advantage of ensuring that all new names and taxonomic acts are checked for compliance with the Code before they are made available.

Registration as Publication
Several recent initiatives, particularly the NSF-funded Planetary Biodiversity Inventories (PBIs), are attempting to promote taxonomy as a largely web-based discipline (e.g., http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation /projects/solanum/). It seems inevitable that in the near future the Code will have to cover solely web-published taxonomic descriptions and nomenclatural acts. One possible response would be the development of a system whereby successful registration on the ZooBank database would be equivalent to publication. However, the implications of equating the act of registration in ZooBank as equivalent to publication via more traditional means (as prescribed in the current edition of the ICZN Code) are substantial, and demand careful consideration by a broad spectrum of the zoological research community.
Paramount among the implications of a "registration=publication" scenario is the issue of peer review. While current provisions for peer review of taxonomic papers are often far from ideal, standards in taxonomy continue to be maintained largely by consensus. The fact that a carefully enforced peer review system would be an essential component of any "registration=publication" initiative provides an opportunity to reform current procedures. International editorial boards appointed for peer review of solely web-based taxonomic publications would need to be appointed to deal with web taxonomic publications in a systematic way. Collaboration with taxon-focussed learned societies could be a first step to the development of such review boards (e.g. International Society of Hymenopterists for Hymenoptera papers; etc), perhaps via the International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS).

Changing the ICZN Code
Mandatory registration as an additional criterion of availability under the ICZN Code will require substantial changes to several Code Articles. Changes to the Code can be implemented in one of two ways: as amendments to the existing (4th) edition, or in the context of a new (5th) edition. Introducing registration as a mandatory requirement for all newly established names and nomenclatural acts, while maintaining the current requirement for publication of such names and acts, could be established through amendments to the existing edition of the Code. More sweeping changes, such as equating the act of registration (with peer review) to publication, would probably best be introduced with a new (5th) edition of the Code.

P. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

 

 
 
 
ICZN: an Associate Participant to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) & a Scientific Member of the International Union of Biological Science (IUBS)
 

 

Home |The Code | The Bulletin | Official Lists and Indexes| Support ICZN | Contact ICZN


© International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature

Created & maintained by Dr. Simon Coppard simc (at) nhm (dot) ac (dot) uk
iczn (at) nhm (dot) ac (dot) uk | ICZN Home
Updated August 2007

Bumblebee Crinoid (Feather Star) Dead Nettle Leaf Beetle Bigfin Reef Squid Kakapo (Owl Parrot) Siberian Tiger