BZN Volume
63, Part 2, 30 June 2006
Abstracts
of Cases
Abstracts
of the Applications published on 30 June 2006 in Volume 63,
Part 2 of the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature
Comment
or advice on any of these Applications is invited for publication
(subject to editing) in the Bulletin and should be sent
to the Executive Secretary, International Commission on Zoological
Nomenclature, c/o The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road,
London SW7 5BD, U.K. (e-mail: iczn@nhm.ac.uk).
Case
3346 (see Opinion
2178)
Misumena
nepenthicola (currently Henriksenia nepenthicola;
Arachnida, Araneae, THOMISIDAE): proposed attribution of
authorship to Pocock (1898)
Pekka
T. Lehtinen
Centre for Biodiversity, University of Turku, Turku,
FIN-20014, Finland (e-mail: pekleh@utu.fi)
Abstract. The
purpose of this application, under Articles 12 and 50.1 of
the Code, is to validate the commonly used, but incorrect,
attribution of the synonym Misumena nepenthicola (currently Henriksenia
nepenthicola) to Pocock (1898). This name of a nepenthicolous
thomisid spider from Borneo was unavailable from the original
paper by Pocock (1898). It is threatened by the available
but not widely used name Misumenops nepenthicola Bristowe,
1930 and by its primary homonym Misumenops nepenthicola Fage,
1928, used for a different spider species from Singapore.
It is proposed that the attribution of the name to Pocock
(1898) is validated.
Keywords. Nomenclature;
taxonomy; Arachnida; Araneae; MISUMENINI; Misumena; Misumenops; Henriksenia; Henriksenia
nepenthicola; Borneo; Singapore; crab spiders; Nepenthes
pitchers.
Case
3334 (see Opinion
2180)
Colias
alfacariensis Ribbe, 1905 (Insecta, Lepidoptera, PIERIDAE):
proposed conservation of the specific name by giving it precedence
over three senior subjective synonyms
Josef Grieshuber
Singham 42, 94086 Bad Griesbach, Germany (e-mail:
Colias@t-online.de)
Bob Worthy
10 The Hill, Church Hill, Caterham, Surrey CR3 6SD, U.K. (e-mail:
bobworthy@btopenworld.com)
Gerardo Lamas
Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de
San Marcos, Apartado 14–0434, Lima-14, Peru (e-mail:
glamasm@unmsm.edu.pe)
Abstract. The
purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.3 of the Code,
is to conserve the specific name alfacariensis Ribbe,
1905, which is in widespread use for a butterfly species of the
genus Colias Fabricius, 1807 (family PIERIDAE). The
name is threatened by three little-used senior subjective synonyms, Colias
hyale sareptensis Alphéraky, 1875, Colias hyale
alba Rühl, 1893 and Colias hyale meridionalis Krulikowsky,
1903. It is proposed that C. alfacariensis is given
precedence over the other three names whenever it and any of
the others are considered to be synonyms.
Keywords. Nomenclature;
taxonomy; Lepidoptera; PIERIDAE; Colias; Colias
alfacariensis; Colias sareptensis; Colias alba; Colias
meridionalis; Europe; Russia; Iran.
Case
3339 (see Comments 63:3, 63:4 &
Opinion 3339)
Celaenorrhinus ratna Fruhstorfer,
1908 (Insecta, Lepidoptera): proposed conservation of the specific
name
Yu-Feng Hsu
Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University,
Taipei, Taiwan 116, Taiwan (e-mail: t43018@cc.ntnu.edu.tw)
Hideyuki Chiba
Natural Science Department, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii
96817, U.S.A. (e-mail: skipper@i.bekkoame.ne.jp)
Shen-Horn Yen
Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-Sen
University, Kaohsiung 804, Taiwan (e-mail: shenhornyen@hotmail.com;
shenhornyen@mail.nsysu. edu.tw)
Abstract. The
purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.3 of the Code,
is to conserve the specific name Celaenorrhinus ratna Fruhstorfer,
1908 for a widespread hesperiid butterfly, very common in the
tropics. The name is threatened by a senior subjective synonym Celaenorrhinus
kawakamii (Matsumura, 1907), which has not been catalogued
or used since 1907. It is proposed that the name ratna Fruhstorfer,
1908 is conserved by suppression of kawakamii Matsumura,
1907.
Keywords. Nomenclature;
taxonomy; HESPERIIDAE; Celaenorrhinus ratna; Celaenorrhinus
kawakamii; hesperiid butterfly; Asia.
Case
3342 (see Opinion
2181)
Phalaena croesella Scopoli,
1763 (currently Adela croesella; Insecta, Lepidoptera):
proposed conservation of usage of the specific name
Mikhail V. Kozlov
Section of Ecology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland (e-mail:
mikoz@utu.fi)
Abstract. The
purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.3 of the Code,
is to conserve the widely used specific name Phalaena croesella Scopoli,
1763 (currently Adela croesella) for a common European
fairy moth (family ADELIDAE) by designating a neotype. The current
use of the name P. croesella is based on a misidentification
and this makes it a junior subjective synonym of Phalaena
degeerella Linnaeus, 1758 (currently Nemophora degeerella).
It is proposed that all previous type fixations for Phalaena
croesella Scopoli, 1763 are set aside and a neotype is designated.
Keywords. Nomenclature;
taxonomy; ADELIDAE; Phalaena; Adela; Adela
croesella; Nemophora degeerella; fairy moth; Europe.
Case
3344 (see Opinion
2179)
Pseudorthocladius Goetghebuer,
1943 and Mesosmittia Brundin, 1956 (Insecta, Diptera,
CHIRONOMIDAE): proposed conservation of the generic names
Martin Spies
c/o Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstr.
21, D-81247 München, Germany (e-mail: spies@zi.biologie.uni-muenchen.de)
Abstract. The
purpose of this application, under Articles 23.4 and 23.9.3 of
the Code, is to conserve the generic names Pseudorthocladius Goetghebuer,
1943 and Mesosmittia Brundin, 1956 for two widespread
genera of non-biting midges by the suppression of Pseudorthocladius Edwards,
1932. Pseudorthocladius Edwards, 1932 is a senior homonym
of Pseudorthocladius Goetghebuer, 1943, but has not
been used for the last 50 years, being replaced with Mesosmittia Brundin,
1956. It is proposed that the replacement of Pseudorthocladius Edwards,
1932 with Mesosmittia Brundin, 1956 is accepted.
Keywords. Nomenclature;
taxonomy; CHIRONOMIDAE; Pseudorthocladius; Mesosmittia; Pseudorthocladius
curtistylus; Mesosmittia flexuella; non-biting
midges.
Case
3373 (see Opinion
2184)
Ateles geoffroyi (Mammalia,
Primates): proposed attribution of authorship to Kuhl, 1820
Colin Groves and Justin J.H.
Hines
School of Archaeology & Anthropology,
Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T.
0200, Australia (e-mail: Colin.Groves@anu.edu.au)
Paulina D. Jenkins
Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell
Road, London SW7 5BD, U.K. (e-mail: p.jenkins@nhm.ac.uk)
Abstract. The
purpose of this application, under Article 50.1 of the Code,
is to validate the common but incorrect attribution of the name Ateles
geoffroyi to Kuhl (1820). This is a longstanding error perpetuated
in the primate literature and it is proposed that the attribution
of the name to Kuhl (1820) be validated.
Keywords. Nomenclature;
taxonomy; Ateles; Ateles geoffroyi; Ateles
melanochir; Kuhl; Nicaragua; spider monkey.